tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3704399.post3879430134579150804..comments2023-10-26T04:53:21.986-05:00Comments on <a href="http://huckupchuck.blogspot.com">The Huck Upchuck</a>: Andrew Sullivan on Ron PaulHuckhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15878450464298055466noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3704399.post-1102537712066646952015-07-18T03:01:14.242-05:002015-07-18T03:01:14.242-05:00Christian Louboutin uk, 2015 hot jerseys, Christia...<a href="http://www.christian-louboutinuk.co" rel="nofollow">Christian Louboutin uk</a>, <a href="http://www.2015hotjerseys.com" rel="nofollow">2015 hot jerseys</a>, <a href="http://www.christian-louboutinuk.co" rel="nofollow">Christian Louboutin shoes</a>, <a href="http://www.christian-louboutinuk.co" rel="nofollow">Christian Louboutin Outlet</a>, <a href="http://www.2015hotjerseys.com" rel="nofollow">nfl hoodies jerseys,nhl hoodies jerseys,nba hoodies jerseys</a>Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06400860789735716626noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3704399.post-23917232861894116362011-12-27T10:27:19.082-06:002011-12-27T10:27:19.082-06:00Or to put it another way, where was Sullivan's...Or to put it another way, where was Sullivan's "super-ego" when he ignored Obama's association with Jeremiah Wright and endorsed him in 2008? I guess his "id" didn't lose any sleep about voting for a President who chose to take spiritual guidance from an avowed racist who prayed for God to damn America.Ericnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3704399.post-67602989423257706732011-12-27T10:19:39.610-06:002011-12-27T10:19:39.610-06:00I think Andrew Sullivan was always much more conce...I think Andrew Sullivan was always much more concerned with how many readers he might lose than which Republican candidate he should support before voting for Obama.<br />He miscalculated how a Ron Paul endorsement would play with his readership and now he is backpeddling. <br /><br />Ron Paul's newsletters, and Paul's explanation for them, are very old news, and should have been a factor in any responsible journalist's decision to endorse Ron Paul. If Sullivan's research of Paul was so shallow and his judgment so bad, perhaps his readers should give him the same second look that he gave Ron Paul.<br /><br />Paul is admittedly a horrible candidate for the Republicans, but anybody who dumps their support for him over this newsletter fiasco was never very serious about their support in the first place.Ericnoreply@blogger.com